Below is a list of three songs, a link to YouTube videos of them, and a link to their lyrics. Choose one of these songs and, weaving in textual evidence from both the song's lyrics and the text of the play, connect it to one of the four main characters: Prior, Louis, Joe, or Harper. If you do not have headphones, you may read the lyrics. If you have headphones, you may listen to the song as you read along with the lyrics. You may not share headphones. This is an individual assignment.
A complete response will be 100-200 words and include an MLA heading and a conclusion. The full rubric is posted below.
For tomorrow, read Act Two, Scenes Two and Three.
Song list:
"Let You Down" -- NF
Song link
Lyrics link
"Before You Start Your Day" -- twenty | one | pilots
Song link
Lyrics link
"Losing to You" -- Stars
Song link (Note: lyrics end at 4:14)
Lyrics link
Description
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Claim:
The response makes a clear, arguable claim that can be supported by evidence.
|
The
text introduces a compelling claim that is clearly arguable and presents a
purposeful position on the prompt, and the response is structured to support
the claim.
|
The
text introduces a precise claim that is clearly arguable and takes an
identifiable position on the prompt, using an effective structure aligned
with the claim.
|
The
text introduces a claim that is arguable and takes a position, using a
structure aligned with the claim.
|
The
text contains an unclear or emerging claim that suggests a vague position,
and attempts a structure and organization to support the position.
|
The
text contains an unidentifiable claim or vague position, and has limited
structure and organization.
|
Development:
The response provides sufficient evidence to back up the claim and a
conclusion supporting the argument.
|
The
text provides convincing and relevant textual evidence to back up the claim.
The conclusion strengthens the claim and evidence.
|
The
text provides sufficient and relevant textual evidence to back up the claim.
The conclusion effectively reinforces the claim and evidence.
|
The
text provides sufficient textual evidence to back up the claim. The
conclusion ties to the claim and evidence.
|
The
text provides textual evidence that attempts to back up the claim. The
conclusion merely restates the position.
|
The
text contains limited textual evidence related to the claim. The text may
fail to conclude the argument or position.
|
Cohesion:
The response uses words, phrases, and clauses to link major sections of the
text, creates cohesion, and links the claim to the evidence.
|
The
text strategically uses words, phrases, and clauses to link major sections of
the text. The text identifies the relationship between the claim and the
textual evidence.
|
The
text skillfully uses words, phrases, and clauses to link major sections of
the text. The text identifies the relationship between the claim and the
textual evidence.
|
The
text uses words, phrases, and clauses to link major sections of the text. The
text connects the claim and the reasons.
|
The
text contains limited words, phrases, and clauses to link the major sections
of the text. The text attempts to connect the claim and reasons.
|
The
text contains few, if any, phrases and clauses to link the major sections of
the text. The text does not connect the claims and reasons.
|
Style
and Conventions: The response uses academic English, including proper
grammar, spelling, and word usage, and has a properly formatted MLA heading.
|
The
text presents an engaging, formal, and objective tone, intentionally using
academic English conventions of usage and mechanics along with an MLA heading.
|
The
text presents an appropriate, formal, and objective tone, demonstrating
academic English conventions of usage and mechanics along with an MLA
heading.
|
The
text presents a formal, objective tone, demonstrating academic English
conventions of usage and mechanics along with an MLA heading.
|
The
text illustrates a limited awareness of formal tone, and demonstrates some
accuracy in academic English conventions of usage and mechanics.
|
The
text illustrates a limited awareness or inconsistent tone, and demonstrates
inaccuracy in academic English conventions of usage and mechanics.
|
Total Points: ___ / 20
No comments:
Post a Comment